Morning Kin Lian, I totally agree with the wreirts. It is the price we have to pay for outsourcing. Eg if we outsource to do Project A, these people only focus on Project A and does not assess the implications it may affect by executing Project A. Reason it involves other Govt Dept, too much red tape and no budget so the easier way is to ignore them. Like the Orchard Flood, they straight away 'tai chi' cause due to debris choke which to any child, it is just an excuse. Now with other areas flooding, they just keep numb about it. This is how our civil service work. Talk about implementing QCC and productivity? Very sad.Oursourcer http://rsapncajxzf.com [url=http://hmbjayb.com]hmbjayb[/url] [link=http://pszdovmik.com]pszdovmik[/link]

Q"The other side insisted that "a deal is a deal" and<a href="http://cfklphuuo.com"> suohld</a> be honored."UQI believe once a PoA is inked and signed ... the deal at the macro level is firmed. At that level, I do agree that a deal<a href="http://cfklphuuo.com"> suohld</a> be a deal.But at the implementation and technical level, things often do not happen so simply. This is something I observed and experienced even in mega-projects locally in Singapore. Singaporeans (particularly Authorities)take "contracts" and "Agreements" too succinctly; especially those in public service, and would insist they are always smarter and always right, even if they actually are unreasonable. Their tactic is always to "push-away" costs or responsibilities first without even looking at it...and then consider to deliberate again if the other party reacts strongly to oppose.But honestly, what is "signed and agreed" could never be 100% clear, In projects, we have "variation" works whether originally embedded or newly ordered and there is always a standard variation clause in most standard FOC, but complication and interpretation do take place during implementation and execution...there is need to look at it objectively. I believe it is the same for a PoA.I believe cross-cultural barriers and difficulties then crop up negotiation, especially when each party tries to assert and get a better deal out of it, or simply just to push away costs. I believe the above also happened to the Suzhou Ind. Park project. The same "a deal is a deal" approach and cultural issues as the MM put in his memoir about this project, in support of Singapore's stand .... this also happens locally in our projects...and you will see our Authorities and their administrators similarly behaving just like what the CHINA officials were claimed to be behaving during the SIP project; the same way towards our own contractors...if the picture was clearly painted as what the MM put in his Memoir. My point is that there would be "double standards" and it depends on how the arguments actually help you if you are the asserting party in the negotiation.Due to the education system and upbringing here; and the organisational culture of Authorities and business firms here, we still lack the "flexibility" in mindset to deal with matters organically during the implementation stage while we cry there is no "creativity"...we are always asserting and trying to gain something...hence all the complications would crop up after the PoA is signed. Perhaps, we<a href="http://cfklphuuo.com"> suohld</a> not be just asserting "win-win" from the on-start, but just start off from a "lose-lose" base in negotiation, just to consider from the benefits of the ordinary people on both sides...and how to resolve the complications later on mutual grounds.If too much "complications" are considsred from the on-start, I believe the PoA could not even be inked, not to say follow up for implementation...this probably explains why it took 20 years; and with political objectives complicating the scene.

Fantastic goods from you, man. Guestbook | Prepix Style I have understand your stuff<a href="http://mjstifpr.com"> pivuroes</a> to and you are just too wonderful. I actually like what you've acquired here, certainly like what you're stating and the way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is really a tremendous Guestbook | Prepix Style informations.December 21, 2011, 12:46 pm

or go to run cmd type net user your username * and it will say enter new pass u can do this if u have some one in ur falmiy that u dont knoww the password to just go in ur file do this and u can access their files

POPS---THE GREATEST HAUNTING!
IF I HAD TO CHOOSE A PERSON IN MY LIFE
THAT HAS THE BIGGEST INFLUENCE ON ME
AND TAUGHT ME WHAT IT MEANT TO BE A FAMILY WITH VALUES!
I WOULD HAVE TO LOOK FAR INTO THE SKY
       --FOR YOU POPS--
YOU WOULD BE THERE ALWAYS FRONT ROW AND CENTER!
YOU HAVE GUIDED ME WITH YOUR WISDOM, YOUR STORIES, YOUR XPERIENCES
        --YOUR DISCIPLINE---
THAT HAS TAUGHT ME THINGS TAHT I WOULD HAVE NEVER LEARNED ON MY OWN AND  STILL LEARNING TODAY
 OR GIVEN IT A SECOND THOUGHT!
          --I AM HAUNTED--
IT SEEMS WHENEVER THE CHIPS WERE DOWN AND I NEEDED SOMEONE IN MY CORNER
--YOU POPS--WERE ALWAYS THERE FOR ME----AND EVERYONE-- 
EVEN IF IT MEANT---------
          --ROOTING THE UNDERDOG!--
HOW LUCKY I AM
HOW LUCKY EVERYONE IS
TO HAVE HAD A FATHER, A TEACHER, A HUSBAND, AND A TRUE FRIEND
THAT IS NOW AND WILL ALWAYS BE 
TRULY LOVED, ADMIRED, AND GREATLY RESPECTED
BUT MOSTLY TO KNOW THAT DEEP DOWN 
      -- YOU POPS--
TRULY ADMIRED ME!!
            DAD YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN

Dearest Dina, I am so very sorry to hear about the passing of your father. Please accept my heartfelt condolences to you and your family.

James and Katie Salem made a donation to CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY / SOCIETE CANADIENNE DU CANCER

Our thoughts and prayers are with you. May his soul rest in peace.

OBITUARY

Jerry Jacob Zeronian

Passed away on 7 OCTOBER, 2012

Kane-Jerrett Funeral Homes

Show your support

Add a Memory

Share Obituary

Get Reminders

Services